Soluciones
Constructivas
Misión
Casacenter
Constructivo
Productos
Casacenter
Empresa
Valor
Construccion
Especificac.
Constructivas
Sistemas
de Energía
ONE
TWO
An Unify Campus Theory is normally known as a Theory of Everything. The problem with the extension "everything" is that is restricted to everything that you can hold in your mind, and that is never everything. Then, TWO becomes a Theory of a Part within the Whole.
TWO is a theoretical conceptual frame about the universe in a permanent evolving status. In a way, just like Us. Then, understanding Us is not very different to understanding the universe and reality. Then 3 ideas are linked: Us, Context and Universe.
For practical reasons, the content within TWO will be split in 2 sections. The Software section, that contains the conceptual frame and, the Hardware, that contains the data that support the concepts. New content is intended to be permanently added as well as, very likely, many rectifications or updates and editing upon the written. This is a dynamic process.
English is not my native language. So, I am very sorry for the grammatical or editing problems that may arise during reading. It may turn a difficult issue even more hard to understand.
There are some relevant features to remark before introducing the theoretical frame
1- If you are a scientist that loves precision, you will get it from the hard data within TWO. In fact, the precision levels are overwhelming. The data exceeds the scientific capacity to measure the numbers within TWO. However, there is an extremely high price to pay for that. The price is the comprehension behind the abstractions. Just data inside TWO is like having a computer without any software, it does not work. The hard data are mainly very simple matrices. In fact, they are so simple that you would be almost force to think they lack sense. You would likely think they are just random numbers that represent nothing but a senseless effort to match universal constants. There is no way to step out of the mentioned idea without the understanding of the concepts behind TWO. The difficult issue is that the concepts are dense dynamic abstractions expressed as numbers and, to make things harder, any idea or concept is always coming from another idea or concept that seems to be not related. Pure data in the Hardware zone are just in the twilight zone between looking like random information or becoming structured information in forms that will place you in the limits of understanding. If you do not trust there's a logical structure behind the information that explains universal constants, you will remain thinking TWO is just a random structure. Likely, the same way you think about the universe: a random reality. Even the logic rules behind TWO are extremely complex and dynamic so, mainly, are not written at all in order to do not trap you within them too much. Even more difficult, the concepts are at essential level, are, at core level. The last, in order to work as concepts for many and many different situations. Thereafter, numbers, instead of expressing something like "3 of something", will be expressed as only "3" in order to allow you to change dynamically your bases according to the contextual frame you are trying to understand. To understand conceptually TWO is an extremely demanding process.
2- The concepts behind TWO may become occasionally or most of the time very disturbing and, likely, quite disruptive in some occasions to not say in most occasions. On the other hand, perhaps you will share a lot of ideas. What is almost sure is that at any time, TWO will demand you to think or consider something from a perspective you have not embraced before. In some aspects, TWO is so disturbing that a good start up is cleaning up any previous concept you have in your mind about the universe or reality.
3- Unlike most theoretical approaches to an UCT < Unify Campus Theory >, that starts instants after the BIG Bang, TWO focused at the very moment of the merging elements. The "out of nothing instant, like the universe, life, quantum. The concept of Big Bang is replaced within TWO by the Big Ben idea. Like Big Time, Big Welcome. With that in mind, you may understand that the approach of TWO set new bases for understanding reality. The previous mentioned is not contrary to the Big Bang post Big Ben. It is just previous and provides a different perspective. The same with General relativity or quantum mechanics The perspective changes. TWO adds Quantum as an insertion between a frame at the core of everything. That changes meanings an explanations about things we already know or think we know.
4- TWO links the Big Cosmos with Quantum Mechanics under a common frame. To do that, incorporates You as part of the equations or matrices. To do as mentioned, and with extremely high precision, you need to understand that many concepts will merge as requested bases. However, it is quite relevant to remark that TWO is intended to always be consistent with any scientific observation or physical measure of the universe or reality. Quite different for TWO is to share some current explanations normally given to events.
5- Data from Hardware match reality in TWO as far as the decimal capacity of an excel spread sheet delivers. And that is just enough for TWO purpose.
6- It would be very possible that some concepts that are intended to explain reality and the universe may be wrong. If it is so, I hope that not too much. It is just about providing some basic structure that makes sense. There are too many very complex concepts behind TWO that will always require to be polished. Hopefully, thanks to other people collaboration.
7- The mayor mathematical tools you need to understand hard data in TWO is to SUM and to Multiply. However, you are allow to Rest and to Divide but merely as a fast track way to depure some concepts. The high simplicity of the demanded mathematical operations to understand the universe has a counterpart, The concepts involved becomes each time more and more complex. You are required to systematically alternate between relative and absolute concepts, tangible and intangible scenarios crossing systematically. And ,once you lean on any absolute concepts, you will have to change your initial perspective, no matter how smart you are. You will not ever be capable of holding in your mind or papers the amount of dynamics concepts at once. Naturally, I cannot do it either. Even harder, The conceptual bases of TWO do not allow you to hold steady linear chronological sequences. Then, it will become very strange to you the systematic process of jumping or leaping from one conceptual issue to another. The writhing within TWO will appear as un-ordered, without focus, without consistency. It is because to integrate an UCT you are force to integrate and link concepts from others fields as insertions in between an idea. Thus, an UCT like TWO demands physics, chemistry, math, geometry, philosophy, neurology, anthropology, theology , Quantum Mec.,, Informatic, Cosmology, etc and etc. One single source is never enough. TWO Also demands You and, demands from You. But above all, demands you to consider others perspective.
8- Of course, many strange phenomena's within reality make sense as possible and likely within TWO, just the way they happen in reality. You may provide or nor space in your mind to them, it is up you, just like in reality.
Note : It is recommended to read very slow, gradually and to consider extra time to make some reflections. It would be useful to read more than once and article after have read others article. TWO will make much more sense gradually. Each article delivers and idea for you to consider in your mind, There's no right reading order. Putting all ideas together, at once, become impossible. You are forced to jump from one idea to another, gradually. That way you can structure some sense. The concepts are like a pendulum. The concepts goes from one side to another but every time you return to an articule, the pendulum scope reduces. It is like reading more than one time a book or watching a movie many times. Each time you see different things.
No formula is possible to put everything into just a single frame. Most content is written in English, however, some articles are in Castellano * Spanish.
To Remember always:
From the moment you mentally close the largest conceptual option
then
TWO will start to lack sense for you
The largest option is always the One capable to hold within the smaller One.
That is the path TWO attempts to follow as logical structure.
The whole in One means "T.W.O. + x" with the extension "plus" or "+" and "x" . The "+" is to remind you about the importance of never closing any status in your mind and always consider an additional incoming element that changes the previous bases. The "Multiply" symbol or "X" is intended to remind you about the multiplying consequences of anyone's actions within an interconnected reality and universe. The adding symbol, most of time will be expressed as "1". It is intended to express the relative or absolute adding that breaks any balance or symmetry. Within TWO, there is no symmetry.
The "multiply" symbol is also added as an extension for "TWO. It is normally present when crossing planes into reality, It is about the chain effects that affects more than one, usually many. As your actions crosses different planes, the effects of them affect reality with multiplying effects.
Within reality, You and the universe and everything is mainly about "+" and "x"~ adding and multiplying.
When moving from One towards TWO,
2 is within 1 and 1 is within 2.
Then,
Three is possible
and TWO becomes a part
and that is how this story goes.
Andres del Rio Lihn
Facebook Andres del Rio