Soluciones
Constructivas
Misión
Casacenter
Constructivo
Productos
Casacenter
Empresa
Valor
Construccion
Especificac.
Constructivas
Sistemas
de Energía
ONE
TWO
Preface
An Unify Campus Theory is normally known as a Theory of Everything. The problem with the extension "everything" is that is restricted to everything that you can hold in your mind and that, is never everything. Then, TWO becomes a Theory of a Part within the Whole.
TWO is a theoretical conceptual frame about the universe in a permanent evolving status. For practical reasons, the content will be split in 2 sections. The Software, that contains the conceptual frame and, the Hardware, that contains the data that support the concepts. New content is intended to be permanently added as well as, very likely, rectifications or updates. English is not my native language so I am very sorry for the grammatical or editing problems that may arise during reading.
The whole in One means TWO with the extension "plus" or "+" . This is to remind you about the importance of never closing any status in your mind. The "Multiply" symbol or "X" is intended to remind you about the multiplying consequences of anyone's actions within an interconnected reality and universe. The adding symbol, most of time will be expressed as "1". It is intended to express the relative or absolute adding that breaks any balance or symmetry. Within TWO, there is no symmetry.
The "multiply" symbol is also added as extension for "TWO + x" It occurs when crossing planes into reality, It is like the superposition physical phenomenon. As your actions crosses different planes, the effects of them affect reality with multiplying effects. The same when looked upside-down.
Within reality, you and the universe and everything is about mainly "+" and "x"~ adding and multiplying.
When moving from One towards TWO,
then, 2 is within 1,
then,
Three is possible
and TWO becomes a part
and that is how this story goes.
There are some relevant features to remark before introducing the theoretical frame
1-If you are a scientist that loves precision, you will get it from the hard data within TWO. In fact, the precision levels are overwhelming, beyond scientific capacity to measure. However, there is an extremely high price to pay for that. The price is comprehension. Just data in TWO is like having a computer without any software, it does not work. The hard data are mainly very simple matrices. In fact, they are so simple that you would be almost force to think that they lack sense. You would think they are just random numbers that represent nothing but a senseless effort to match universal constants. There is no way to step out of the mentioned idea without the understanding of the concepts behind TWO. The difficult issue is that the concepts are dynamic and, to make things harder, any idea or concept is always coming from another idea or concept that seems to be not related. Pure data in the Hardware zone are just in the twilight zone between looking like random information or becoming structured information in forms that will place you in the limits of understanding. If you do not trust there's a logical structure behind the information that explains universal constants, you will remain thinking TWO is just a random structure. Likely, the same way you think about the universe, a random reality.
2- The concepts behind TWO may become occasionally or most of the time very disturbing and, likely, quite disruptive in some occasions. On the other hand, perhaps you will share a lot of ideas. What is almost sure is that at any time, TWO will demand you to think or consider something from a perspective you have not embraced before. In some aspects, TWO is so disturbing that a good start up is cleaning any previous concept you have in your mind about the universe or reality.
3- Unlike most theoretical approaches to an UCT < Unify Campus Theory >, that starts instants after the BIG Bang, TWO focused at the very moment of the merging of the Universe. Thus, the concept of Big Bang is replaced within TWO by the Big Ben idea. With that in mind, you may understand that the approach of TWO set new bases for understanding reality. The previous mentioned is not contrary to the Big Bang, is just previous and provides a different perspective. The same with General relativity or quantum mechanics. TWO adds. It is an insertion that changes meanings an explanations about things we already know or think we know.
4- TWO links the Big Cosmos with Quantum Mechanics under a common frame. To do that incorporates You as part of the equation. To do so, and with extremely high precision, you need to understand that many concepts will merge. However, it is quite relevant to remark that TWO is intended to always be consistent with any scientific observation or physical measure of the universe or reality. Quite different for TWO is to share some current explanations normally given to events.
5-Data from Hardware match reality in TWO as far as the decimal capacity of an excel spread sheet. And that is just enough for TWO purpose.
6-It would be very possible that some concepts that are intended to explain reality and the universe may be wrong. If it is so, I hope that not too much. It is just about providing some basic structure that makes sense. There are too many very complex concepts behind TWO that will always require to be polished. Hopefully, thanks to other people collaboration.
7- The mayor mathematical tools you need to understand hard data in TWO is to SUM and to Multiply. However, you are allow to Rest and to Divide but merely as a fast track way to depure some concepts. The high simplicity of the demanded mathematical operations to understand the universe has a counterpart, The concepts involved becomes each time more and more complex. You are required to systematically alternate between relative and absolute concepts, tangible and intangible scenarios crossing systematically. And ,once you lean on an absolute concepts, you will have to change your initial perspective, no matter how smart you are. You will not ever be capable of holding in your mind or papers the amount of dynamics concepts at once. Naturally, I cannot do it either. Even harder, The conceptual bases of TWO do not allow you to hold steady linear chronological sequences. Then, it will become very strange to you the systematic process of jumping or leaping from one conceptual issue to another. The writhing within TWO will appear as un-ordered, without focus, without consistency. It is because to integrate an UCT you are force to integrate linked concepts from others fields as insertions in between an idea. Thus, an UCT like TWO demands physics, chemistry, math, geometry, philosophy, neurology, anthropology, theology , Quantum Mec.,, Informatic, Cosmology, etc and etc. One single source is never enough. TWO Also demands you and, demands from you.
8-Of course, many strange phenomena's within reality make sense as possible and likely within TWO, just the way they happen in reality. You may provide or nor space in your mind to them, it is up you, just like in reality.
Note > It is recommend to read very slow, gradually and to consider extra time to make some reflections. It would be useful to read more than Once and article after have read others article. It will make more sense. Each article delivers and idea for you to consider in your mind, There's no right reading order. Putting all ideas together, at once, become impossible. You are forced to jump from one idea to another, gradually. That way you can structure some sense.
No formula is possible to put everything into just a single frame. Most content is written in English, however, some articles are in Castellano * Spanish.
From the moment you mentally close
the largest or bigger options within TWO
then
TWO start to lack sense for you
The largest option is always the One capable to hold within the smaller one.
Andres del Rio Lihn
Facebook Andres del Rio
Behind Energy
there's encrypted
information
12+
2 is bigger than 1, except when 1 can contain 2
3 is bigger than 2, except when 1 contains 3
The one that represents you cannot ever be bigger than 49% if 2 is bigger than 1
Esentials
If you add a last name to an abstraction, you restrict its potential
12+
in Reality
is
120
within TWO
abstractions
First Base
TWO opens up some universal constant coding structures
If 1 represent You, then the 2 that represent what is not you is always bigger than you.
If You are within 2, as part of a continuos, then
Software I
Introducing Life
Multiplying
Chemistry - The linking element
Insertions
The Standing Position
Axioms and Conclusion , overlap
Hydrogen - Oxigen > H2O
The meaning of numbers
The dices
Cubits - bits
Dark matter
Dark energy
About appearances
The exception that makes the rule
Forming groups and levels
Both and Blurry
Time
Cycles
Gravitational forces
Plato Cave
Multiverses
The mirror Image
1 does not equal 1
1 equals 6 - Connecting us all
History
Evolution - on X axis
Evolution - on Y axis
Philosophy
Light, Energy and processors
Motion / Left or Right > Part I
Motion / The Whole Insertion > Part II
The physics restrictions
The mathematical restrictions
The maximum content
The processes
The relation among elements
The crossing roads
The black Jack
The days
What is true
The Scale
The puzzle
The driving forces
Radio and TV signals
The life cicle
Over light speed
DNA > Tracing back
The Shakespeare dilemma
Beyond God
Aliens posibilities
Constitutional bases
Limits
Hardware
Oxygen
Universal Constants
Content Chart
Last up date
17/02/24
15/02/24
11/03/24
19/02/24
22/02/24
12/04/24
12/04/24
15/04/24
13/03/24 26/02/24
05/04/24
26/02/24
24/02/24
25/03/24
10/03/24
10/03/24
23/03/24 15/03/24
24/03/24
24/03/24
Last up date
11/03/24
28/03/24 - 18/10/19
28/03/24 - 18/10/19
05/03/24 - 18/10/19
08/03/24 - 18/10/19
08/03/24 - 18/10/19
18/10/19
18/10/19
18/10/19
18/04/24
09/03/24
09/03/24
11/03/24
Unify Campus Theory - UCT
The Whole in One + x : T.W.O. Plus and multiply
or simply TWO
Index
Content to be likely added or released gradually, weekly